In a marketing crisis, should you make a statement before you have a good answer?
Tuesday, December 11th, 2007It’s impossible to avoid hearing about the latest crisis in corporate America. Mattel and other toy makers recalling Chinese-made toys tainted with lead paint. U.S. Airlines and other carriers frustrating travelers with record flight delays and cancellations. Patriots were caught cheating. Whole Foods’ CEO blogging under the disguise of an analyst, allegedly to drive down the stock price of its acquisition target, Wild Oats.
When do you think a company should respond to a crisis?
Upon the news of Mattel’s lead paint problems, if you also import products from China and think that many of your products might also be tainted, do you respond immediately or do you wait as long as it takes to be certain? As a marketer in charge of PR, how would you manage the messaging around a crisis? Let me know what you think!
In April, at the annual leadership conference for the
Apparently the AMA is not alone in it’s hunt to own one of 26 letters of the alphabet as their brand. While
In fact, on October 1st, QVC will reveal another step in their push for a new brand of their own. On a huge New York bilboard, QVC will continue staking their claim on the letter “Q”. The first set of billboards they put out in early September, in NY, Philly and LA, had the catchphrase, “

Last May, it was speculated that Google would buy China’s primary portal,
“This partnership leverages the strong offerings of two Internet powerhouses to provide Internet users in China [with] a better overall experience,” Sina’s chief executive officer Charles Chao said in a statement. 
